| Tunisia's
second GSM license: Is the emphasis on upfront license fees hurting
the GSM markets in Arab North Africa?
A new research report from the Arab Advisors Group
www.arabadvisors.com examines the award of the second GSM license
in Tunisia to Orascom Telecom. The dear upfront license fees paid
for North African GSM licenses may not bring about an optimal situation,
Arab Advisors Group points out.
March 27, 2002 -
The Tunisian second GSM license saga is finally over. After delays,
and even a cancellation of a tender process, the tender has finally
been awarded to Orascom Telecom which bid US$454 million for the
license. Tunisia's GSM tender attracted several international investors.
One bidder was Telefonica Moviles, which bought Morocco's second
GSM license in 1999 as part of the Telefonica and Portugal Telecom
consortium. Another bidder was Telecom Italia, which paid US$2.25
billion for Turkey's third GSM license, not including US$344 million
in value-added tax payments. Kuwaiti National Mobile Telecommunications
(Wataniya), one of the duopoly GSM operators in Kuwait was also
one of the bidders.
A new report, entitled Orascom Telecom snatches Tunisia's second
GSM license, was released to the Arab Advisors Group's (www.arabadvisors.com)
Strategic Research Service subscribers on March 27, 2002.
"Orascom Telecom's consortium, has, by acquiring the Tunisia
GSM license, managed to increase Orascom Telecom's GSM licenses
in the Middle East and Africa to 21. Naturally, with Orascom Telecom
slated to sell its controlling stake in Telecel (the pan-African
GSM operator) it stands to shed nine of its sub-Saharan African
licenses and to remain with 12 GSM operations." Wrote Ms. Hala
Baqain, Arab Advisors Analyst in the report.
"The new license gives Orascom Telecom an envied presence
in Tunisia after it secured one in Algeria last year. Both countries
have notoriously underserved GSM markets and have lower affordability
barriers than in Egypt and Morocco, two Arab north African countries
with a far more impressive GSM uptake than Algeria and Tunisia"
Ms. Baqain said. As www.arabadvisors.com shows, by year-end 2001
Tunisie Télécom, The GSM penetration rate in Tunisia
stood at 3.6% which is one of the lowest in the Arab World (higher
only than Syria, Algeria and Sudan amongst the major Arab markets).
It worthy of note that North African GSM licenses have been selling
at dear prices. In 1998 Egypt sold each of its two GSM licenses
at more than US$0.5 billion. It was followed by Morocco, which sold
its second GSM license at close to US$1.1 billion and then came
Algeria in 2001, which sold a second GSM license for US$737 million.
The Tunisia license sale confirms the trend: Comparing the value
of Tunisia's license per capita with the other countries, Tunisia
has the highest value per capita at US$45. Naturally License terms
differed markedly, which makes strict per-capita-comparisons not
very accurate. For example, the Egyptian government collects hefty
annual license fees on each subscriber from the two operators while
the Moroccan, Algerian and Tunisian governments simply collect the
upfront license fees and even offer tax incentives for the operators.
Moreover, Algeria and Tunisia stand to collect the fees in two installments.
Finally, the three countries of Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco offered
international gateway rights for the operators and in the cases
of Tunisia and Algeria extendable license durations.
The Arab Advisors Group believes that the emphasis on upfront license
fees may not carry optimal results for the Arab communications markets
and consumers. Like it or not, hefty license fees are financed by
loans that operators will have to pay back. As such, license fees
eventually come out of the pockets of consumers, who will pay higher
rates than the global average. Moreover, operators burdened from
the start by license fee loans, may be less inclined to invest heavily
in their infrastructure and quality of coverage.
"Licenses that include revenue sharing over the license duration,
as well as quality and coverage conditions, may be much better than
licenses that are designed to maximize an upfront license fee at
all costs" Ms. Baqain said. "The lifetime value (total
cumulative value) of the Egyptian licenses -measured by total government
collections over the license duration- will end up being the highest
amongst the licenses examined even though it had the lowest per
capita upfront license fee." She concluded.
|